Skip to main content

Lecture Review: The Ethical Case Against Intellectual Property

 


Since this week's readings focused on the concepts of intellectual property, privacy, and ethics, I decided to dive into a YouTube search focused on these topics. In this search, I stumbled upon this lecture from David Koepsell. I was intrigued by the points Koepsell makes on the concepts of ownership versus possession. When I first began the lecture, my immediate response was "how on earth can we function with intellectual property law? What is to stop anyone from taking anyone else's intellectual work as their own?" but this does not seem to be the point that Koepsell is trying to make. My understanding is more that he believes intellectual property should be free and available to the masses- we should not be met with paywalls to access information. He has a few key points he makes throughout his lecture:

  • Commons by Necessity v. by Choice: commons by choice are things we intentionally keep public, such as national parks. Necessity refers to things kept public because they cannot physically be owned, such as air and sunshine. 
  • Violation of Autonomy and Self-Expression: In this part of the lecture, Koepsell emphasizes the idea that intellectual property law is restrictive of people's ability to explore and express ideas freely. These restrictions are wrong as they infringe on people's autonomy and the right to share and build upon knowledge. 
  • Critiques Utilitarian Justifications: Kroepsell points out that proponents of intellectual property law believe it encourages innovation, but he disagrees. He says that the economic benefits do not justify the ethical implications of restricting the individual's access to information. 
All in all, Koepsell believes IP laws are indefensible due to the privatization of resources that should be accessible to everyone. As a public educator, this concept resonates with me. It makes sense to me that every student has access to the same information and resources, despite their socioeconomic status. I also lean towards the idea that progress is made by building on what has already been done, and that progress can be easily halted or saved for select people with IP laws. 

Definitely something to look into a bit more deeply, but I found the lecture fascinating nonetheless! 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Thoughts on the Education of Digital Natives

  Thoughts on the Education of Digital Natives   As M ay comes to a close, I am finishing my 8 th year as an educator in the public education system. I have worked as an ELA teacher for grades 6-12, taught Creative Writing and Journalism, and am finishing my second year as a media specialist in a middle school. I consider myself to be a digital native- we got our first computer when I was around 7 or 8 years old. However, I do think my experience with technology has been very different from my students because I have lived through the hyper-speed evolution of technology. Computers look very different now from when we got our first fa mily computer in the early 2000s, but the biggest difference is that most of my students do not start their technology journey with a computer, but with a cell phone.   One of the biggest gaps in digital education I see at the secondary level is a lac k of direct instruction on how to use technology effectively. I think that because our ...
2 comments
Read more

Interactions with Social Media Pre-EME6414

  Interactions with Social Media Pre-EME6414 For my first post, it felt appropriate to think about the ways I already utilize social media. Currently, I have accounts on the following platforms: Instagram (since high school) Facebook (since high school) Threads (for about a year) BeReal (about two years) Snapchat (since high school)  Pinterest (since high school) Reddit (since high school) Logically, I know social media can be used professionally. It is a great way to form larger and more diverse learning communities for a variety of skills. Social media is a huge part of advertising and influencer as a career is at an all-time high. This is even reflected in our other cultural media. For example, the reality show The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives exists because a group of women made a career out of TikTok, referring to it as "MomTok." However, I have very mixed feelings about the use of social media and do not use it to the extent that many people do. For me, doom scrolling o...
2 comments
Read more

Thoughts from Middle Schoolers

  How do middle school students see technology as affecting their education and lives?  This week I decided to sit down and have some conversations with my students before releasing them for the summer. I asked them specifically how they felt technology had influenced their education and social lives. These were some of the responses I got, paraphrased from the general Gen Z vernacular: "I think that technology can be cool, but it can also be repetitive. Some teachers do the same things over and over, which gets old."  'I wish I could only be on my Chromebook all the time. It's more fun than anything else in class."  "I don't want technology to take over my life. I think the 90s were cool, people talked to each other more." "Okay, but I talk to people all the time, just on my phone."  "My chromebook helps me learn, I don't like doing book work because it is boring,"  "I like book work, I can understand it better."  ...
2 comments
Read more