Skip to main content

Lecture Review: The Ethical Case Against Intellectual Property

 


Since this week's readings focused on the concepts of intellectual property, privacy, and ethics, I decided to dive into a YouTube search focused on these topics. In this search, I stumbled upon this lecture from David Koepsell. I was intrigued by the points Koepsell makes on the concepts of ownership versus possession. When I first began the lecture, my immediate response was "how on earth can we function with intellectual property law? What is to stop anyone from taking anyone else's intellectual work as their own?" but this does not seem to be the point that Koepsell is trying to make. My understanding is more that he believes intellectual property should be free and available to the masses- we should not be met with paywalls to access information. He has a few key points he makes throughout his lecture:

  • Commons by Necessity v. by Choice: commons by choice are things we intentionally keep public, such as national parks. Necessity refers to things kept public because they cannot physically be owned, such as air and sunshine. 
  • Violation of Autonomy and Self-Expression: In this part of the lecture, Koepsell emphasizes the idea that intellectual property law is restrictive of people's ability to explore and express ideas freely. These restrictions are wrong as they infringe on people's autonomy and the right to share and build upon knowledge. 
  • Critiques Utilitarian Justifications: Kroepsell points out that proponents of intellectual property law believe it encourages innovation, but he disagrees. He says that the economic benefits do not justify the ethical implications of restricting the individual's access to information. 
All in all, Koepsell believes IP laws are indefensible due to the privatization of resources that should be accessible to everyone. As a public educator, this concept resonates with me. It makes sense to me that every student has access to the same information and resources, despite their socioeconomic status. I also lean towards the idea that progress is made by building on what has already been done, and that progress can be easily halted or saved for select people with IP laws. 

Definitely something to look into a bit more deeply, but I found the lecture fascinating nonetheless! 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Thoughts from Middle Schoolers

  How do middle school students see technology as affecting their education and lives?  This week I decided to sit down and have some conversations with my students before releasing them for the summer. I asked them specifically how they felt technology had influenced their education and social lives. These were some of the responses I got, paraphrased from the general Gen Z vernacular: "I think that technology can be cool, but it can also be repetitive. Some teachers do the same things over and over, which gets old."  'I wish I could only be on my Chromebook all the time. It's more fun than anything else in class."  "I don't want technology to take over my life. I think the 90s were cool, people talked to each other more." "Okay, but I talk to people all the time, just on my phone."  "My chromebook helps me learn, I don't like doing book work because it is boring,"  "I like book work, I can understand it better."  ...
2 comments
Read more

The Effects of Social Media in the Classroom

  Link to Article This week I found an interesting article on the effects social media can have on student academics. The study uses a mixed methodology of interviews, literature reviews, and data analysis of found patterns.  Overall, this article found that social media has an overall negative effect on student's grades, focus, attention span, and classroom behavior.  HOWEVER.  I find that the educators and students identified and analyzed in this article are rooted in extremely traditional educational values and rules. I think it is rather obvious that social media would not be beneficial to the traditional classroom. These methods are generally rooted in lecture, work, and assessment, with little room for choice outside of what the teacher leads. Social media does not have to "undermine learning" in high school classrooms.  The world has changed so much in the last 10 years alone. I graduated from high school in 2013, and we were just getting to the point whe...
1 comment
Read more

Week 11 Reflection

 This week, the majority of my energy went towards my produsage assignment. For my project, I chose to focus on something that I can use at the middle school where I work: a lesson on literary analysis. This is a concept that can be difficult to teach, especially when you have students who hate reading. The traditional "assign a story and answer questions about it" is not engaging to this generation of students. Asking them to read independently can be like pulling teeth, depending on the class.  My project was created with the goal of combining traditional reading, writing, and analysis skills with the engagement of social media. Analysis can happen in so many forms, so I thought sites like TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook would serve as great mediums for showcasing their analysis. It gives them a choice in how they would like to present their analysis: they could create a TikTok from the perspective of a character, create a moodboard on Pinterest that reflects the theme of t...
Post a Comment
Read more